My "Big Idea" Class Project Paper...How to Solve Childhood Obesity
Unit
6 Invention Lab – Parents and Schools Working to Combat Childhood Obesity
Corey
Queen
Kaplan
University
CM220-50-Unit 6
Childhood Obesity is a topic that has to
be addressed at the community level, with families and schools needing to take
part in creating effective solutions, for it to be finally defeated. Lifestyle,
diet, and exercise are the 3 key ways that must be engaged in equally to solve
this growing epidemic. In the U.S. one out of every three children are
considered overweight (Gavin, 2012). The lessor known risk for childhood
obesity include low self-esteem, being bullied, developing unhealthy eating
habits like bulimia and anorexia, and many others that simple studies can’t
measure. The Big Idea will introduce how schools and parents working together
will both combat this epidemic and prove financially beneficial in boosting the
local economy. The Big Idea will provide the blueprint in solving childhood
obesity without blaming people or pointing fingers; but by showing how a community
synergy that includes parents and schools, the two largest influences in a
child’s life, can put an end to this growing epidemic.
Childhood obesity is when a child is significantly above
their normal weight, or BMI for their age/weight ("Definition
of childhood," 2012). Problems that develop from childhood obesity are
such as, but not limited to: Type 2 Diabetes, high blood pressure, heart
issues, breathing difficulties, sleep apnea and many others. Previously, these
were poor health conditions that used to be strictly an adult only problem. To
help combat this epidemic, key factors and their impact on childhood obesity
should be examined.
Food choices can impact childhood obesity in both a
positive and a negative way. As being seen now, poor food choices (high in
saturated fat, empty calories, sugars, etc.) severely negatively impact
childhood obesity because it adds to it, along with lack of exercise. Proper
food choices can impact childhood obesity by combatting it from ground zero,
inside the body of the children. Proper food choices, combined with the proper
knowledge of why these choices are important, help keep the body doing things
like producing the correct levels of insulin, the right amount of cholesterol,
and the right amount metabolism fat burning process. Food impact alone can help
to combat childhood obesity, but not solve it in the long run.
Exercise will impact childhood obesity by helping the body
do what it does naturally. Bodies burn fat, process waste and pump blood
naturally, childhood obesity disrupts these natural functions. Exercise would
help teach children how to enjoy life and get bodies moving. Exercise and food
are two key ways to combat childhood obesity and can be heavily influenced by
home life.
Family habits impact childhood obesity because no matter
what plans is intact for someone to try and beat obesity, life at home must
help supplement this healthy lifestyle change for the child. Children don’t buy
groceries; parents do, and must use that power of influence to pick healthy
alternatives for snacks like fruits and vegetables. Parents should not buy
overly sweetened drinks, as well as limit the amount of times when eating out. Eating
in front of the TV is another factor that will not help children overcome
childhood obesity, so families should eat at the dinner table together to help
teach children a proper relationship with food.
Eating a healthy breakfast is not only important to combat
childhood obesity, but it is vital. Breakfast helps to energize children for the
morning, and keep them going with sustained energy, getting them ready for the
day ahead. A proper breakfast consisting of things like fiber, unsaturated
fats, or lean protein will help reduce caloric intake in a child, helping to
boost the body’s ability to lose weight (Quinene,
2011). With most of these suggestions, the key is family.
Childhood obesity tends to run in families because children
are mirrors to what is happening at home. If parents aren’t active, then it is
unrealistic to expect children to do what their parents don’t. If parents get
and stay active, children will follow suit. This will go a long way to combat
childhood obesity. Obesity runs in the family based on whatever the parents
choose to do or not to do. With all of the focus on parents, the other part of
the synergy union is the influence of schools.
Currently, schools are adding to the problem of childhood obesity
by not providing better food choices for children. Vending machines filled with
empty calorie, overly sugary, saturated fatty choices, not only deny proper
nutrition to children, but actually are counterproductive to the learning
atmosphere of what school is intended to be. School lunches are not any better
with the processed, frozen, fried options that are provided to children for
children to sustain them in the middle of their day. Some schools are even
reporting that children are eating fast food for lunch at least twice a week ("Childhood obesity: Half," 2012). Poor
nutrition options are not the only causes that are contributing to childhood obesity.
Schools have also added to the growing epidemic of childhood
obesity by cutting physical activity, such as P.E. or even some sports, due to
budget cuts. If the benefits of physical activity, in the long term for
children, were truly explored and reported, then school officials would realize
cutting it out of the curriculum is just like cutting out core learning
classes. A community garden would not only reintroduce physical activity to
schools, but it would help educate children on proper nutrition as well as
where their food comes from.
Families and schools must work together to solve childhood
obesity because we have seen so far that when they work apart, or blame each
other, childhood obesity has grown to the national epidemic. By working
together, the two biggest influences in a child’s life, can build a network of
nutritional knowledge, love of physical activity, and positive reinforcement
that will not only yield positive strides to combat childhood obesity, but provide
financial benefits to the community as well. The lynchpin in all of this really
focuses around meals being served to the children, both at home and at school.
It is imperative that schools develop healthier lunches
because of a two-sided reason: 1) The damage that the empty caloric,
fried-than-flash-frozen, processed, high sodium continues to do to children; 2)
The short and long term benefits that proper nutrition has over school aged
children. Children who follow the path of proper nutrition tend to develop both
positive physical and emotional characteristics, such as: stronger bones,
healthy weight, positive self-image, more mentally alert in school (Coila, 2011). One surefire, guaranteed way of making
sure children are fed nutritional lunches, is to implement a community garden
that would be tended to, with supervision, by these same children.
Having a community garden would cut down on the absurd
spending that schools are paying for quality food to be processed and shipped
to them. No one keeps track of how much is spent on schools processing
perfectly good food, but school officials do keep track of it. In Michigan,
their education department gets raw chicken for free, worth $11.40 a case and
then pays to have it processed into fried chicken nuggets, costing $33.45 a
case. In San Bernardino, CA, schools spend $14.74 on French fries out of $5.95
worth of fresh potatoes (Komisar, 2011). It is
easy to see how money, even spent on hiring skilled lunchroom workers, once a
school kitchen goes back to actually preparing food, would save large amounts
of money that would have an immediate positive economic impact. Now, as
mentioned in the beginning of this paper, there is another component to solving
childhood obesity.
For parents to be successful in their part
in this battle with childhood obesity, just like their children, they gain
nutritional knowledge about the food that is in the house, in the store and
more importantly, on the table. In proper meal planning and cooking, parents
are given the ability to take back the empowering feeling of the knowledge they
have prepared a great tasting and nutritionally beneficiary meal for the
family. Parents are both a role model for children in how and what to eat, but
they also control what is bought for the household (Coila, 2011). Also helping
to provide education on those easily swayed fast food commercials will provide
children with the proper insight when they are out and pass the familiar golden
arches or hamburger royalty.
Sports are an organized and structured way to get children
doing what is natural to them: move. With schools cutting back or even eliminating
P.E., and some team sports, it is imperative, now more than ever, that schools
and parents, the community, get children moving again. More than the health
benefits, studies show that children who participate in sports perform better
academically as well ("High school
athletes," 2001).
Schools and parents working together,
combatting childhood obesity will succeed if they start and continue to engage
in open and honest dialogue. This union would benefit the most precious victims
of childhood obesity, the children themselves. Schools working to get their
food from local farms instead of paying for empty calorie to be transported to
them would save money with less travel costs and would generate a rise in the
local economy. Having a community garden would help to educate children and
families on how proper nutrition is both a financially feasible, but a fun
solution. This synergic approach will take the focus away from looking for whom
to blame and bring solutions giving children back what they deserve: better
quality of life.
REFERENCES
Gavin, M. (2012, February). Overweight and obesity.
Retrieved from
http://kidshealth.org/parent/general/body/overweight_obesity.html
Definition of childhood obesity. (2012, May 4). Retrieved from http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/childhood-obesity/DS00698/
Quinene, P. (2011, January 29). Can healthy eating help childhood
obesity?. Retrieved from http://www.livestrong.com/article/369124-can-healthy-eating-help-childhood-obesity/
(2012). Childhood obesity: Half of
inner-city schoolchildren eating fast food twice a week. International Business Times,
Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com.lib.kaplan.edu/ehost/detail?sid=fa1698cd-62b8-4d1d-a03d-e86aca19682f@sessionmgr104&vid=2&hid=108&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ==
Coila, B. (2011, May 03). Nutrition facts for kids.
Retrieved from http://www.livestrong.com/article/81032-nutrition-kids/
Komisar, L. (2011, December 3). How the food industry eats your
kid's lunch. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/04/opinion/sunday/school-lunches-and-the-food-industry.html?pagewanted=all
(2001). High school athletes outperform
nonathletes again by wide margins in massive statewide academic study. North Carolina high school athletic
association, 54(1), 2.
Retrieved from http://benefitsofyouthsports.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/NC-High-School-Athletic-Association-Bulletin-Fall-2001.pdf
amen.
ReplyDeleteA ton of useful information. Thank you. Chris Kelley - Framingham.
ReplyDelete